CO129-246 - Acting Governor Fleming - 1890 [8-9] — Page 560

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

asked to pass a

supplementary vote

to allow expenditure charged to the vote

1

for being transferred to the Tytan Water Works on which the

expenditure was actually incurred. In

a return supplied by this Department in

November last in compliance with instructions received from the Secretary of State, it appears that

works have been charged against the

main drainage

and

Sanitary

vote which clearly ought not to be thus classified. Now although the Surveyor General is of course primarily responsible for these irregularities, I submit that a qualified Public Works Accountant

should call attention to these and

similar inaccuracies.

After my

arrival I

found complaints were frequently made of the

delay

in obtaining payment for work executed or

goods

supplied, and many accounts

have come in which have been

outstanding for one

or even

two

years, and it is

very difficult in cases to ascertain whether these

accounts have been previously

paid or not. I have taken steps to remedy

these abuses, but I feel

utterly unable successfully to cope with the difficulty without a stronger

and improved system of

staff and

accounts. The system which has hitherto prevailed has been that the Contractor (and nearly all the work of the Department has been done by Contract) should send in his account from time to time. The Officer in charge of the work (too frequently an Overseer) examined

and certified the account. It is then examined by the Assistant Surveyor General who should refer disputed points to the Surveyor General for any ...

Edit History

2026-05-26 10:42:15 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
asked to pass a supplementary vote to allow expenditure charged to the vote 1 for being transferred to the Tytan Water Works on which the expenditure was actually incurred. In a return supplied by this Department in November last in compliance with instructions received from the Secretary of State, it appears that works have been charged against the main drainage and Sanitary vote which clearly ought not to be thus classified. Now although the Surveyor General is of course primarily responsible for these irregularities, I submit that a qualified Public Works Accountant should call attention to these and similar inaccuracies. After my arrival I found complaints were frequently made of the delay in obtaining payment for work executed or goods supplied, and many accounts have come in which have been outstanding for one or even two years, and it is very difficult in cases to ascertain whether these accounts have been previously paid or not. I have taken steps to remedy these abuses, but I feel utterly unable successfully to cope with the difficulty without a stronger and improved system of staff and accounts. The system which has hitherto prevailed has been that the Contractor (and nearly all the work of the Department has been done by Contract) should send in his account from time to time. The Officer in charge of the work (too frequently an Overseer) examined and certified the account. It is then examined by the Assistant Surveyor General who should refer disputed points to the Surveyor General for any ...
Baseline (Original)
asked to pass a supplementary vote to allow expenditure charged to the vole 1 for being transferred to the Tytan Water Works on which the avas ac critlay actually incurred. In a rehau supplied by this Department in November last in compliance with instructions received from the Secretary of State, it appears that works have been charged against the main dr drainage and Sanitary vose which clearly ought not to be. thus classified. Now al although the Surveyor General is of course prunarily responsible for these irregularities, I submit that a qualified Public Works Accountant should call attention to these and similar inaccuracies. Q made of the After my arrival found complaints were frequently delay in obtaining payment for work executed or goods goods 2 556 :oods supplied, and many. accampa have come in which have been outstanding for ne or even two years, and it is davi very difficult inn cases to ascertain whether these accounts have been previously paid or not. I have taken steps these abuses, but I feel 4.0 remedy utterly unable anccessfully to cope with the difficulty without a stronger improved system of staff and art accounts. The system which has hitherto prevailed has been that the Contractor (and nearly all the work of the Department has been done ! by Contract / should send in his account from time to time. The Officer in charge of the work (too frequently Overseer/examined. ar and certified the accorint. It is then examined by the Assistant Surveyor General who should refer disputed points to the Surveyor General any
2026-05-26 10:42:15 · Baseline
View content

asked to pass a

supplementary vote

to allow expenditure charged to the vole

1

for being transferred to the Tytan Water Works on which the

avas ac

critlay

actually incurred. In

a rehau

supplied by this Department in

November last in compliance with instructions received from the Secretary of State, it appears that

works have been charged against

the

main dr

drainage

and

Sanitary

vose which clearly ought not to be. thus classified. Now al

although the Surveyor General is of course prunarily responsible for these irregularities, I submit that a qualified Public Works Accountant

should call attention to these and

similar inaccuracies.

Q

made of the

After

my

arrival

found complaints were frequently

delay

in obtaining payment for work executed or

goods

goods 2

556

:oods supplied, and many. accampa

have come in which have been

outstanding for

ne

or even

two

years, and it is

davi

very difficult inn cases to ascertain whether these

accounts have been previously

paid or not. I have taken steps

these abuses, but I feel

4.0

remedy

utterly unable anccessfully to cope with the difficulty without a stronger

improved system of

staff and

art

accounts. The system which has hitherto prevailed has been that the Contractor (and nearly all the work of the Department has been done ! by Contract / should send in his account from time to time. The Officer in charge of the work (too frequently

Overseer/examined.

ar

and certified the accorint. It is then examined by the Assistant Surveyor General who should refer disputed points to the Surveyor

General

any

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.